
Postwar social changes and technological advances in America profoundly influenced Hollywood filmmaking. The invention of television produced direct competition. Audience expectations demanded more complex characters and more mature themes. Hollywood adapted by incorporating technology into filmmaking that would fascinate audiences and draw them back into the movie theaters. Experiments in defying the Production Code led to the screening of more mature films and changes in the code.
“By 1960 there were 50 million TV sets in homes across the United States, and lots of people were watching a lot of television: in 1960 the average daily viewing time for U.S. households with a TV set was over 5 hours a day” (Lewis 233). Television was a new toy that people could enjoy, and it was free. Families could gather around the TV set after dinner and enjoy watching it together. The advertisements exposed viewers to new products.
The Hollywood studios adapted by creating new business relationships with the television studios. “Disney led the way, making a deal with the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) that included the production of a Disney TV show that aired weekly on the network” (Lewis 234).
These synergies were so successful that multinational conglomerates began buying up Hollywood studios and formulating new ways to produce and distribute films. For example, “Gulf and Western Industries bought Paramount in 1966” (Lewis 237). Hollywood studios contracted with TV studios to run their movies as a second run. Walt Disney negotiated a deal with ABC to create Disneyland, an amusement park. These deals brought in much-needed revenue to the studios.
The conglomerates abandoned production in favor of distribution. They began using market research and tie-ins with books and other merchandise. Technological gimmicks such as 3-D and widescreen were tried (Lewis 234). But what finally brought audiences back to the movie theaters was the distribution of foreign-made films and defiance of the Production Code (Lewis 238-247).
While American audiences enjoyed foreign-made films, these movies were produced by European standards and often came into conflict with the standards of the PCA. Otto Preminger completed his controversial film The Moon is Blue, in 1953. When United Artists submitted it to the PCA, it was rejected. As a result, United Artists gave up its membership in the MPAA to avoid a fine (Lewis 239).
Theater owners, however, were more than willing to screen an adult-themed film that did not have the PCA seal, and “The Moon is Blue grossed over $4 million in its initial release” (Lewis 239). Preminger used the same strategy with his second movie, The Man with the Golden Arm. As more and more controversial films were released, the PCA was forced to relax some of its codes.
Jack Valenti, who was named the president of MPAA in 1966, agreed to an exception for the release of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?. Warner Bros. labeled it For Mature Audiences and left it to the theater owners to decide whether to screen it or not. Pretty soon, Welcome to Hard Times was released with the label NO PERSON UNDER 18 ADMITTED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY A PARENT (Lewis 244-245). Finally, in 1968, the MPAA came up with a new voluntary rating system: G (General Audiences), M (Mature Audiences and parental discretion), R (Restricted and no one under age sixteen unless accompanied by a parent or adult guardian), and X (no one under sixteen admitted). Films with an X rating could not receive a PCA seal (Lewis 283).
The new rating system gave Hollywood the latitude to create a greater variety of films. With social change rapidly advancing, the studios began targeting the youth audience and the social issues which were important to them (Lewis 285). For a short time, studios began promoting “topical movies with a political edge” (Lewis 286) produced by new, young directors (auteurs) who could tap into young audiences’ interests. The most famous and most profitable movie produced was The Godfather in 1972, directed by Francis Ford Coppola. But as iconic as many of these films are today, studios wanted more formulaic films whose success could be easily reproduced, and the “auteur renaissance” (Lewis 282) ended. Action blockbusters formed the new wave of Hollywood films by the 1980s.
Hollywood has been resilient over the decades and found ways to adapt to new technologies, changes in audience interests, and restrictions placed on them by the Supreme Court. Always alert to new avenues of revenue, Hollywood has survived by its willingness to negotiate new (and more profitable) deals.
Dawn Pisturino
Thomas Edison State University
January 17, 2018
Copyright 2018-2022 Dawn Pisturino. All Rights Reserved.
Works Cited
Lewis, Jon. American Cinema: A History. New York: Norton, 2008.
thanks 👍👍
LikeLiked by 3 people
You’re welcome!
LikeLiked by 2 people
❤️❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating!!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you! Hollywood is a fascinating place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh I am sure:):)
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ironic that Hollywood’s “golden era” was smack in the middle of when the production code was in force (1935-1965). The insights you gave to the various deal making was quite interesting. I’m still troubled by the lack of creativity Hollywood exhibits. There’s an art niche not being satisfied by the film INDUSTRY.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I agree. They want guaranteed profits, so they don’t want to take a chance on anything new, exciting, original, and too controversial.
LikeLike
the old boob tube aka idiot box.
LikeLiked by 3 people
TV Guide. What a flashback photo. That was like a Bible for my wife.
LikeLiked by 5 people
A lot of people, I think!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting post, Dawn.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post Dawn! Gosh I remember those TV Guides. We bought them all the time, when TV was all so simple back then!!! LOL 😜📺🤗
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes, my husband and I were just talking about that! And it was free!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The TV was free, not the TV guide. And even the ads could be entertaining!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes ma’am, they were affordable and didn’t nickel and dime you like the thousands of streaming services we have these days! UGH! 😲🙀🙄
LikeLiked by 1 person
But then every time I think our television is horrible, I have to remember Australia had ‘Skippy the Bush Kangaroo!’ (trying to capitalize on the whole Lassie phenomenon) Kangaroos don’t work well when you need the audience to empathize with an animal. “Go get help Skippy!” and he just kind of looks at you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL. No, you need Kangaroo Jack, who wallops you!
LikeLike
😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was very educational!
LikeLiked by 3 people
I thought so too ~ and we’ll written 👌
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Ana!
LikeLike
Yes, the ‘beast’ knows how to mutate successfully when challenged by the landscape of commercialism.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] How Hollywood Survived the Invention of Television — Dawn Pisturino’s Blog […]
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing!
LikeLike
[…] How Hollywood Survived the Invention of Television […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing!
LikeLike